MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

O2pulse Trajectory As An Indicator Of Cardiorespiratory Fitness In Adults With Congenital Heart Disease

2024· article· en· W4402663771 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Meghana Kapa, Alexa Coe, Rachel A. Myers, Brad Bakken, Jessica Hallam, Jordan Balmer, Sangeeta Shah, Justin M. Canada

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiorespiratory fitnessTrajectoryHeart diseaseMedicineDiseasePhysical medicine and rehabilitationCardiologyPhysical therapyInternal medicinePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peak oxygen pulse (O2pulse) obtained with cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is defined as the ratio of oxygen uptake to heart rate (HR) at peak exercise. A surrogate for exercise stroke volume and arteriovenous O2 difference, O2pulse has prognostic value in adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD), but less is known about the significance of the O2pulse trajectory, an analysis of its kinetic response during CPET. PURPOSE: Determine significance and correlates of abnormal O2pulse trajectory in ACHD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of ACHD patients who underwent CPET (including pre-exercise spirometry) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) within ≤1-year apart as part of clinical evaluation at an ACHD specialty center. The O2pulse trajectory was defined as normal (normal curvilinear pattern) or abnormal (flat or decreasing trajectory) throughout the entire exercise period by visual assessment of a CPET expert. The results are reported as mean [SD] or number (%). Group differences (normal vs. abnormal O2pulse trajectory) were evaluated with independent samples T-tests for continuous variables or chi-square tests for nominal variables. RESULTS: CPET data of N = 217 ACHD patients included the following characteristics: 57% female, 75% white race, 36.2 [12.2] years of age, and body mass index (BMI; 28.4 [6.9] kg/m2). Within this group, a cohort of 132 patients (61%) had CMR within 1-year. 46% had abnormal O2pulse trajectory with Tetralogy of Fallot (n = 42 [19] %) being the most common lesion type. The CPET parameters of VO2peak (24.1 [9.9] vs. 20.5 [5.7] mL·kg-1·min-1) and peak O2pulse (13.1 [4.1] vs. 10.5 [3.0] mL/beat) were significantly lower in the abnormal O2pulse trajectory cohort with P < 0.001. Pre-exercise spirometry results of FVC-% and FEV1-% were lower in abnormal O2pulse trajectory cohort; P = 0.012, P = 0.010 respectively. Similarly, LV cardiac output (LVCO; P = 0.015), LV and RV ejection fraction (LVEF; P = 0.017 and RVEF; P < 0.001) were significantly lower. Age, sex, race, lesion type, BMI, hemoglobin levels, O2 saturations (SpO2), or use of beta-blocker was not different between groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An abnormal O2pulse trajectory in ACHD is associated with lower cardiorespiratory fitness and reduced cardiac function and may have clinical significance in CPET interpretation. Dr. Canada is supported by a K23HL159270 grant from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicCardiovascular and exercise physiology→French-language works237,207→