MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402664118 · doi:10.60087/jklst.v3.n4.p169

Skin disease classification using two path deep transfer learning models

2024· article· en· W4402664118 on OpenAlexaff
Ram Chandna, Aarav Bansal, Aryan Kumar, Shrestha Hardia, Omogbolaga Daramola, Anirudh Sahu, Kritika Verma, Karan Dhingra, Saloni Verma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN 2959-6386 (online) · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransfer of learningPath (computing)Artificial intelligenceComputer scienceMedicineComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Skin diseases are among the most common diseases that affect millions of lives per year, yet diagnosing these has several complexities even for trained dermatologists due to overlapping symptoms and features in several diseases. A myriad of deep learning models have been proposed as a solution for diagnosing but a clinically useful model with high accuracy multi disease classification and lower computational complexity is still unavailable. This study focuses on comparing different image pre-processing techniques, transfer learning models and ensemble learning techniques to build a computationally cheap model for 8-class identification of skin diseases. A two path model with EfficientNet and MobileNetV2 transfer learning models as base feature extractors and a final model that stacks the two model results and classifies the images into one of the eight classes is used. The model is trained and tested on ISIC-2019 dataset for 8 class image classification that involves the three types of skin cancers as well. The dataset has an extreme class imbalance problem which leads to favored prediction of the classes with more image, for this first we run simple image augmentation. Secondly, two distinctly processed images are created from each initial image. The two path model takes the two images, gives each to a base model and combines the two outputs, enabling the classifier to consider different features that become prominent due to dissimilar preprocessing techniques. The model is tested with new images on multiple standard metrics to get a final overview of its performance, it gives a diagnosing accuracy of 70% which is close to some state of the art models that consume higher computational power. The classification results imply that by further improving the data gathering and preprocessing techniques along with exploring other base transfer learning models the results of the final model can be reliable while maintaining a low computational requirement, making the diagnoses accessible. This also highlights that such two path algorithms that employ simpler models could be useful for multi class classification tasks where differently processed images might be required to extract features of distinct diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN 2959-6386 (online)Same topicCutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementFrench-language works237,207