MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402679743 · doi:10.1016/j.jobab.2024.09.003

Development of Methylene Bis-Benzotriazolyl Tetramethylbutylphenol-grafted lignin sub-microspheres loaded with TiO2 for sunscreen applications

2024· article· en· W4402679743 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yarong Li, Zicong Tang, Xiaohan Zhou, Junhua Zhang, Xueping Song, Kai Li, Wei Liu, Zhanying Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Bioresources and Bioproducts · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLignin and Wood Chemistry
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGuangxi Innovation-Driven Development ProjectGuangxi UniversityNatural Science Foundation of Guangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLigninMicrosphereMethylene blueMethyleneChemistryChemical engineeringMaterials sciencePhotocatalysisOrganic chemistryCatalysisEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lignin serves as a promising Ultraviolet (UV) absorber within sunscreen industry. However, the commercial development of lignin-containing sunscreens faces challenges due to their low sun protection factor (SPF) and dark color in cosmetics industry. In this study, dual modifications on the chemical and physical structures of lignin were conducted to address these challenges. Initially, methylene bis-benzotriazolyl tetramethylbutylphenol (MBBT) was grafted onto alkali lignin (AL) through an atom transfer radical polymerization reaction, resulting in a polymer of AL-graft-MBBT 3 (AL-g-MBBT 3 ). The sunscreen prepared with 10% AL-g-MBBT 3 displays outstanding sun protection performance with a SPF of 42.93 and a light color with a color difference value (Δ E ) of 45.6, in contrast to 10% AL with a SPF of 4.74 and a Δ E value of 49.5. Subsequently, AL-g-MBBT 3 was transformed into normal submicron spheres (AL-g-MBBT 3 N) and TiO 2 -loading submicron spheres (AL-g-MBBT 3 /TiO 2 ). The sun protection performances of 10% AL-g-MBBT 3 N@C and AL-g-MBBT 3 /TiO 2 @C sunscreens obviously surpass that of AL-g-MBBT 3 @C sunscreen, achieving SPFs of 60.38 and 66.20, respectively. Additionally, there is a considerable improvement in the color of these sunscreens, with Δ E values of 41.8 and 36.3, respectively. These results provide valuable insights into exploring lignin's high-value applications in sunscreen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.098
Threshold uncertainty score0.525

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Bioresources and BioproductsSame topicLignin and Wood ChemistryFrench-language works237,207