MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402689465 · doi:10.1093/brain/awae302

A role for leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1 in regulating pain sensitivity

2024· article· en· W4402689465 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Adham Farah, Ryan Patel, Piotr Popławski, Benjamin J Wastie, Mandy Tseng, Allison M Barry, Omar Daifallah, A Dubb, Ivan Paul, Hoi lao Cheng, Faisal Feroz, Yuhe Su, Marva Chan, Hanns Ulrich Zeilhofer, Theodore J. Price, David Bennett, Kirsty Bannister, John M. Dawes

Bibliographic record

VenueBrain · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPain Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research CouncilMedical Research CentreMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsNeuropathic painNociceptorMedicineSpinal cordNeuroscienceNociceptionAnesthesiaReceptorBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuronal hyperexcitability is a key driver of persistent pain states, including neuropathic pain. Leucine-rich, glioma inactivated 1 (LGI1) is a secreted protein known to regulate excitability within the nervous system and is the target of autoantibodies from neuropathic pain patients. Therapies that block or reduce antibody levels are effective at relieving pain in these patients, suggesting that LGI1 has an important role in clinical pain. Here we have investigated the role of LGI1 in regulating neuronal excitability and pain-related sensitivity by studying the consequences of genetic ablation in specific neuron populations using transgenic mouse models. LGI1 has been well studied at the level of the brain, but its actions in the spinal cord and peripheral nervous system are poorly understood. We show that LGI1 is highly expressed in dorsal root ganglion (DRG) and spinal cord dorsal horn neurons in both mouse and human. Using transgenic mouse models, we genetically ablated LGI1, either specifically in nociceptors (LGI1fl/Nav1.8+) or in both DRG and spinal neurons (LGI1fl/Hoxb8+). On acute pain assays, we found that loss of LGI1 resulted in mild thermal and mechanical pain-related hypersensitivity when compared with littermate controls. In LGI1fl/Hoxb8+ mice, we found loss of Kv1 currents and hyperexcitability of DRG neurons. LGI1fl/Hoxb8+ mice displayed a significant increase in nocifensive behaviours in the second phase of the formalin test (not observed in LGI1fl/Nav1.8+ mice), and extracellular recordings in LGI1fl/Hoxb8+ mice revealed hyperexcitability in spinal dorsal horn neurons, including enhanced wind-up. Using the spared nerve injury model, we found that LGI1 expression was dysregulated in the spinal cord. LGI1fl/Nav1.8+ mice showed no differences in nerve injury-induced mechanical hypersensitivity, brush-evoked allodynia or spontaneous pain behaviour compared with controls. However, LGI1fl/Hoxb8+ mice showed a significant exacerbation of mechanical hypersensitivity and allodynia. Our findings point to effects of LGI1 at the level of both the DRG and the spinal cord, including an important impact of spinal LGI1 on pathological pain. Overall, we find a novel role for LGI1 with relevance to clinical pain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.509
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBrainSame topicPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207