MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Image based Modeling and Control for Batch Processes

2024· article· en· W4402695755 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Process Control · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceControl (management)Image (mathematics)Batch processingProcess engineeringArtificial intelligenceControl engineeringControl theory (sociology)EngineeringProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This manuscript addresses the problem of leveraging thermal images for modeling and feedback control, specifically tailored for terminal quality control of batch processes. The primary objective, common in many batch processes, is to produce products with quality variables aligning with user specifications, available for measurement only at batch termination, precluding the direct use of classical control strategies. Furthermore, in many instances, traditional online sensors such as thermocouples may not be available, but instead spectral inputs like thermal images or acoustic data may be more readily available for feedback control. The challenge is to not only use the non-traditional sensor data for building a dynamic model but also to use that model for terminal quality control. The proposed approach involves a multi-layered modeling strategy. Initially, a dimensionality reduction technique is employed to condense the high-dimensional image into a set of representative outputs. Subsequently, subspace identification (SSID) is applied to develop a Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) State Space (SS) model between the inputs and the reduced outputs. Finally, a Partial Least Squares (PLS) model is constructed linking the terminal states of a batch (identified using SSID) with the product qualities obtained for that specific batch. This model is then incorporated into a Model Predictive Control (MPC) formulation. The effectiveness of the MPC is illustrated by showcasing its capability to generate products of high quality by deploying the MPC on a bi-axial lab-scale rotational molding setup. • Handling high dimensional output feedback in quality control for batch processes • Implemented on pilot-scale biaxial rotational molding process • Output feedback is in the form of thermal images in the current application • Neural Networks and Dimensionality reduction used to reduce the images first • Achieved quality control in a closed loop setting on an actual process

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.531

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it