Image based Modeling and Control for Batch Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This manuscript addresses the problem of leveraging thermal images for modeling and feedback control, specifically tailored for terminal quality control of batch processes. The primary objective, common in many batch processes, is to produce products with quality variables aligning with user specifications, available for measurement only at batch termination, precluding the direct use of classical control strategies. Furthermore, in many instances, traditional online sensors such as thermocouples may not be available, but instead spectral inputs like thermal images or acoustic data may be more readily available for feedback control. The challenge is to not only use the non-traditional sensor data for building a dynamic model but also to use that model for terminal quality control. The proposed approach involves a multi-layered modeling strategy. Initially, a dimensionality reduction technique is employed to condense the high-dimensional image into a set of representative outputs. Subsequently, subspace identification (SSID) is applied to develop a Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) State Space (SS) model between the inputs and the reduced outputs. Finally, a Partial Least Squares (PLS) model is constructed linking the terminal states of a batch (identified using SSID) with the product qualities obtained for that specific batch. This model is then incorporated into a Model Predictive Control (MPC) formulation. The effectiveness of the MPC is illustrated by showcasing its capability to generate products of high quality by deploying the MPC on a bi-axial lab-scale rotational molding setup. • Handling high dimensional output feedback in quality control for batch processes • Implemented on pilot-scale biaxial rotational molding process • Output feedback is in the form of thermal images in the current application • Neural Networks and Dimensionality reduction used to reduce the images first • Achieved quality control in a closed loop setting on an actual process
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".