Multivariate SPC via sequential multiblock-PLS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The sequential multi-block partial least squares (SMB-PLS) is proposed for implementing a multivariate statistical process control scheme. This is of interest when the system is composed of several blocks following a sequential order and presenting correlated information, for instance, a raw material properties block followed by a process variables block that is manipulated according to raw material properties. The SMB-PLS uses orthogonalization to separate correlated information between blocks from orthogonal variations. This allows monitoring the system in different stages considering only the remaining orthogonal part in each block. Thus, the SMB-PLS increases the interpretability and process understanding in the model building (Phase I), since it provides a deep insight about the nature of the system variations. Besides, it prevents any special cause from propagating to subsequent blocks enabling their use in the model exploitation (Phase II). The methodology is applied to a real case study from a food manufacturing process. • A novel scheme for multivariate statistical process control based on SMB-PLS. • Ensuring interpretability and preventing special cause propagation. • Real case study: SMB-PLS scheme in food manufacturing statistical process control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".