MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402701778 · doi:10.1101/2024.09.13.24313620

Longitudinal changes in epigenetic clocks predict survival in the InCHIANTI cohort

2024· preprint· en· W4402701778 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Pei‐Lun Kuo, Ann Zenobia Moore, Toshiko Tanaka, Daniel W. Belsky, Ake T. Lu, Steve Horvath, Stefania Bandinelli, Luigi Ferrucci

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of OtagoCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchNational Institutes of HealthUniversity of California
KeywordsEpigeneticsLongitudinal studyProportional hazards modelDemographyMedicineBiologyGerontologyInternal medicineGeneticsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstracts Importance Cross-sectional assessment of epigenetic clocks provides information on the pace of aging. Whether longitudinal acceleration or deceleration of epigenetic clocks over time provides additional mortality prediction is unknown. Objective To test the independent associations of baseline levels and longitudinal changes in epigenetic clocks with mortality Design Longitudinal study Setting InCHIANTI, a population-based study of community dwelling individuals in Tuscany, Italy. Participants 699 InCHIANTI study participants aged 21-95 years at baseline with longitudinal measurements of DNA methylation. Exposure Baseline levels and longitudinal changes in seven epigenetic clocks, including two first-generation clocks developed using chronological age for reference (Hannum Clock, Horvath Clock), three second-generation clocks developed using time-to-death for references (DNAmPhenoAge, DNAmGrimAge, DNAmGrimAge Version 2), and two third-generation clocks developed using longitudinal rate of change of multiple phenotypes for reference (DunedinPOAm_38, DunedinPACE). Main Outcomes and Measures Mortality was the primary outcome. Cox regression was used to estimate independent associations of baseline and longitudinal changes in epigenetic clocks with mortality. Results Adjusting for age, sex, study sites, and epigenetic clock at the baseline, longitudinal changes of the following epigenetic clocks were associated with mortality: Hannum clock (aHR = 1.14, 95% CI:[1.03, 1.26]), DNAmPhenoAge (aHR = 1.23, 95% CI: [1.10,1.37]), DNAmGrimAge (aHR = 1.13, 95% CI: [1.02,1.26]), DNAmGrimAge Version 2 (aHR = 1.18, 95% CI:[1.06,1.31]), and DunedinPOAm_38 (aHR = 1.15, 95%CI: [1.01,1.30]). Conclusions and Relevance Our findings confirm that epigenetic clocks capture a dimension of health that is predictive of mortality and add the notion that time changes of epigenetic age reflect changes in health that additionally and independently contribute to mortality prediction. Future studies should test whether interventions that slow down the rate of epigenetic aging are associated with longer healthspan and lifespan. Key Points Question: Is the rate of change in epigenetic clock associated with differential mortality? Findings: In 699 adults with followed for up to 24 years, faster longitudinal changes in epigenetic clocks (Hannum clock, DNAmPhenoAge, DNAmGrimAge, DNAmGrimAge version 2, DunedinPOAm_38, DunedinPACE) were significantly associated with higher mortality, independent of baseline epigenetic age and other confounders. Meaning: Independent of chronological age, epigenetic clock and change over time of epigenetic clock independently predicted the risk of death. Interventions that slow down the pace of epigenetic aging may enhance healthy longevity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→