Probing the effects of polysaccharide hydrogel composition on the viability and pro‐angiogenic function of human adipose‐derived stromal cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Cell therapies harnessing the pro‐vascular regenerative capacities of mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) populations, including human adipose‐derived stromal cells (hASCs), have generated considerable interest as an emerging treatment strategy for peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and its progression to critical limb ischemia (CLI). There is evidence to support that polysaccharide hydrogels can enhance therapeutic efficacy when applied as minimally‐invasive delivery systems to support MSC survival and retention within ischemic tissues. However, there has been limited research to date on the effects of hydrogel composition on the phenotype and function of encapsulated cell populations. Recognizing this knowledge gap, this study compared the pro‐angiogenic function of hASCs encapsulated in distinct but similarly‐modified natural polysaccharide hydrogels composed of methacrylated glycol chitosan (MGC) and methacrylated hyaluronic acid (MHA). Initial in vitro studies confirmed high viability (>85%) of the hASCs following encapsulation and culture in the MGC and MHA hydrogels over 14 days, with a decrease in the cell density observed over time. Moreover, higher levels of a variety of secreted pro‐angiogenic and immunomodulatory factors were detected in conditioned media samples collected from the hASCs encapsulated in the MGC‐based hydrogels compared to the MHA hydrogels. Subsequent testing focused on comparing hASC delivery within the MGC and MHA hydrogels to saline controls in a femoral artery ligation‐induced CLI (FAL‐CLI) model in athymic nu / nu mice over 28 days. For the in vivo studies, the hASCs were engineered to express tdTomato and firefly luciferase to quantitatively compare the efficacy of the two platforms in supporting the localized retention of viable hASCs through longitudinal cell tracking with bioluminescence imaging (BLI). Interestingly, hASC retention was significantly enhanced when the cells were delivered in the MHA hydrogels as compared to the MGC hydrogels or saline. However, laser Doppler perfusion imaging (LDPI) indicated that the restoration of hindlimb perfusion was similar between the treatment groups and controls. These findings were corroborated by endpoint immunofluorescence (IF) staining showing similar levels of CD31 + cells in the ligated limbs at 28 days in all groups. Overall, this study demonstrates that enhanced MSC retention may be insufficient to augment vascular regeneration, emphasizing the complexity of designing biomaterials platforms for MSC delivery for therapeutic angiogenesis. In addition, the data points to a potential challenge in approaches that seek to harness the paracrine functionality of MSCs, as strategies that increase the secretion of immunomodulatory factors that can aid in regeneration may also lead to more rapid MSC clearance in vivo.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".