Broadly Reactive Anti-VHH Antibodies for Characterizing, Blocking, or Activating Nanobody-Based CAR-T Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Production of chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapies is dependent on the use of antibody reagents to label, isolate, and/or expand T cell products. We sought to create antibody-based tools that directly target the variable domain of heavy-chain only antibodies (VHH or nanobody) used in some CAR molecules. Two murine antibodies were identified which bind to distinct epitopes in the conserved framework regions of llama-derived VHHs, and not to human VH domains. We produced a high-quality dual-clonal anti-VHH antibody product which reacts with over 98% of VHH proteins, regardless of their antigenic specificity. Anti-VHH binding did not disrupt VHH/antigen interaction, and thus could be used for secondary labeling to assess cellular or tissue reactivity of VHH molecules. Despite not interfering with antigen binding, anti-VHH antibodies potently inhibited VHH-CAR function, blocking CAR-T activation and cytolytic killing of target cells. When immobilized, anti-VHH antibodies could also be applied for activation and expansion of VHH CAR-T cells, inducing 730-fold mean expansion, >94% CAR purity, with retained CD8/CD4 heterogeneity. Functionally, anti-VHH antibody-expanded CAR-T cells maintained strong antigen specific activity without functional exhaustion. Overall, these data identify a useful new tool for understanding and manipulating VHH-based CAR-T cells. Funding Source This work was funded by the National Research Council Canada Disruptive Technology Solutions Cell and Gene Therapy challenge program, and BioCanRx Declaration of interests The anti-VHH antibodies reported here are the subject of a provisional patent application by the National Research Council of Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".