Part V, Hemichordata, 2nd Revision, Chapter 3, p. 197-308
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB), a group of rare hereditary diseases, characterized by the development of blisters in the cutaneous-mucosal region of the entire body, in response to minimal trauma, heat, or no apparent cause. birth or during the first years of life. The present study aims to review the literature on the oral manifestations found in patients with Epidermolysis Bullosa, as well as to define the dental clinical management to be followed in cases of EB. SciVerse Scopus, Scientific Electronic Library Online (Scielo), US National Library of Medicine (PUBMED) and ScienceDirect, using the Mendeley Reference Manager. In the oral cavity, an EB can manifest itself in several ways, with changes that vary in severity and quantity, depending on the type of EB, such as the formation of blisters and ulcerations (in the mucosa, palate and tongue), anodontia, junction of the vestibular sulcus (union of the attached gingiva with the oral mucosa), presence of caries and severe periodontal diseases, alveolar bone resorption and hypoplastic dental anomalies, in addition to maxillary atrophy, mandibular prognathism and mandibular course. Malocclusion is even more severe due to atresia of the alveolar arches and delay in tooth eruption. Due to the great difficulty and risk of offering dental treatment to patients with EB, the prevention of disease, biofilm and periodontal disease must be emphasized from childhood. Professionals in treatment should carry out oral hygiene and adequate prophylaxis, a diet program to prevent caries, use of gels, mouthwashes, adjuvant therapies with chlorhexidine D, cotton swabs, sprays and topical varnish applications, fluorides, biofilm scraping and leisure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.082 | 0.058 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".