Capturing the experience of borderline personality disorder symptoms in the daily lives of women with eating disorders.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
= 47) completed 14 days of ecological momentary assessment. All BPD symptoms except affective instability were more common in individuals with comorbid ED-BPD than those with only an ED. Affective instability and paranoia/dissociation had the largest effect sizes, indicating the greatest differences across groups. Individuals with more frequent abandonment avoidance, anger, identity disturbance, paranoia/dissociation, and self-harm over the 14 days engaged in more frequent binge eating, while those with greater emptiness engaged in more frequent restriction and maladaptive exercise. Momentary affective instability predicted an increased likelihood of binge eating, while momentary interpersonal difficulties predicted a decreased likelihood of binge eating, at the next prompt. This study highlights the importance of considering BPD symptoms in the treatment of individuals with EDs to improve their clinical outcomes and quality of life. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it