Sex-dependent association study of complement C4 gene with treatment-resistant schizophrenia and hospitalization frequency
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• C4S and C4AS genetic variants might have sex-dependent protective effects against severe schizophrenia. • C4S is associated with reduced treatment resistance in males with schizophrenia. • Having more copies of C4S is associated with low hospitalization frequencies, particularly in Europeans. • Increased C4A copies was associated with low hospitalization frequencies in males only. The complement component 4 ( C4 ) gene, codes for two isotypes, C4A and C4B, and can exist in long or short forms ( C4L and C4S ). The C4AL variant has been associated with elevated schizophrenia (SCZ) risk. Here, we investigated the relationship between C4 variation and clinical outcomes in SCZ. N = 434 adults with SCZ or schizoaffective disorder were included in this retrospective study. A three-step genotyping workflow was performed to determine C4 copy number variants. These variants were tested for association with clinical outcome measures, including treatment-resistant SCZ (TRS), number of hospitalizations (NOH), and symptom severity (PANSS). Sex and ancestry stratified analyses were performed. We observed a marginally significant association between C4S and TRS in males only, and a negative association between C4S and NOH in the total sample. C4AS had negative association with NOH in males and non-Europeans. Lastly, C4A copy numbers and C4A predicted brain expression showed negative association with NOH in males only. Our study provides further support for sex-specific effect of C4 on SCZ clinical outcomes, and also suggests that C4S and C4AS might have a protective effect against increased severity. C4 could potentially serve as a genetic biomarker in the future, however, more research is required.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".