MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402742556 · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2024.3465848

3D Video Conferencing via On-Hand Devices

2024· article· en· W4402742556 on OpenAlexaff
Yili Jin, Xize Duan, Kaiyuan Hu, Fangxin Wang, Xue Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMultimedia Communication and Technology
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceVideoconferencingMultimediaTeleconferenceComputer graphics (images)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Video conferencing has become indispensable in human communication. Researchers are exploring immersive capabilities to enhance video conferencing experiences by delivering realistic interactions. However, existing methods have stringent and extra hardware beyond a typical video conference, including multiple depth cameras, large screens, and headsets, which pose obstacles to the widespread adoption due to high costs and complex setups. Thus, there is an urgent demand for light-weight systems using only on-hand devices including single RGB camera and standard screen, without additional hardware. We propose DVCO, a novel 3D video conferencing system via on-hand devices. With DVCO, users can experience lifelike virtual conferencing that includes natural contact and interactive features. To achieve this, DVCO has two main components. Virtual Camera Transformation (VCT) and New View Generator (NVG). VCT computes a downscaled sender image from tracking to determine viewpoint and gaze vector, enhancing virtual presence on standard screens. NVG takes an input frame and desired view angle to produce an output reflecting the new view from a single RGB camera. Together, these provide an affordable, easy-to-integrate enhancement for current video conferencing systems without expensive upgrades. Through a user study, it has been demonstrated that DVCO offers an exceptional level of immersion when compared to traditional systems. Experiments are conducted to showcase the superior performance of VCT and NVG in comparison to baseline methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.044

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video TechnologySame topicMultimedia Communication and TechnologyFrench-language works237,207