Deciphering the Benefits of Coordinated Binders in Si‐Based Anodes by Combined Operando/In Situ and Ex Situ X‐Ray Micro‐ and Nano‐Tomographies
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The simple addition of a Zn(II) precursor to a preoptimized poly(carboxylic acid) binder solution enhances the electrochemical performance and cycle life of silicon‐based electrodes. The binder/cation couple forms a cross‐linked coordinated binder that plays a key role in enhancing the mechanical and chemical stability of the electrode microstructure. The impact of the addition of the Zn precursor on the microstructural evolution of the electrode during cycling is investigated at different scales (from cell/electrode to silicon particle scale) using complementary operando, in situ, and ex situ X‐ray tomography techniques. Comparative analyses conducted on the reference and with Zn electrode formulations using operando and in situ X‐ray micro‐tomography allow for monitoring of the electrode morphological deformations along with the crack pattern formation and evolution during cycling. The benefits of the precursor addition include enhancing the mechanical stability of the electrode through a strengthened microstructure more apt to maintaining its integrity, as well as a better anchoring to the current collector leading to decreased electrical disconnections and capacity fade. Moreover, complementary ex situ X‐ray nano‐tomography measurements highlight the benefits of the precursor addition in terms of chemical stability with mitigated solid electrolyte interface (SEI) formation over the electrode cycling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".