MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402749908 · doi:10.1038/s44183-024-00078-2

Rethinking sustainability of marine fisheries for a fast-changing planet

2024· article· en· W4402749908 on OpenAlexaff
Callum M. Roberts, Christophe Béné, Nathan Bennett, James S. Boon, William W. L. Cheung, Philippe Cury, Omar Defeo, Georgia de Jong Cleyndert, Rainer Froese, Didier Gascuel, Christopher D. Golden, Julie P. Hawkins, Alistair J. Hobday, Jennifer Jacquet, Paul S. Kemp, Mimi E. Lam, Frédéric Le Manach, Jessica J. Meeuwig, Fiorenza Micheli, Telmo Morato, Catrin Norris, Claire Nouvian, Daniel Pauly, Ellen K. Pikitch, Fabián Piña Amargós, Andrea Sáenz‐Arroyo, U. Rashid Sumaila, Louise Teh, Les Watling, Bethan C. O’Leary

Bibliographic record

Venuenpj Ocean Sustainability · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSustainabilityBusinessResilience (materials science)Climate changeEnvironmental resource managementEnvironmental planningBiodiversityPsychological resilienceMarine biodiversitySustainable developmentPlanetFisheryNatural resource economicsEnvironmental economicsEnvironmental scienceEcologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Many seafood products marketed as “sustainable” are not. More exacting sustainability standards are needed to respond to a fast-changing world and support United Nations SDGs. Future fisheries must operate on principles that minimise impacts on marine life, adapt to climate change and allow regeneration of depleted biodiversity, while supporting and enhancing the health, wellbeing and resilience of people and communities. We set out 11 actions to achieve these goals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.072

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0090.008
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuenpj Ocean SustainabilitySame topicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesFrench-language works237,207