The When, Where, and Why of Intimacy: Codes of Coupling in Egyptian Contemporary Art
Bibliographic record
Abstract
“Codes of Coupling” is a group exhibition that opened in 2020 at Gypsum Gallery in Cairo, and features the art of Hassan Khan, Jonathas de Andrade, Mohamed Al-Bakeri, Mohammad Shawky Hassan and nasa4nasa. Curated by gallery artist Mahmoud Khaled, the show takes the use of “coupling” bodies as a subject and an aesthetic tool to explore intimacy, gender, power and societal codes through video, film, dance, audio and photographic installations. This chapter seeks to investigate Egyptian contemporary art as it pertains to queer identity narratives in the Middle East. Avant-guard exhibitions like “Codes of Coupling” can help interrogate the performance of gendered identities within Egyptian society in addition to contributing to a decolonial aesthetic practice that reframes queer intimacy. Through the exhibition and deep readings of the artworks within the show, this chapter analyzes the acceptability, permissibility, and illegality of same-sex intimacy within Egypt's modern sexual identity, its relationship to imperialism, and how contemporary queer visual artists disrupt normative identity narratives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".