MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402782053 · doi:10.1016/j.jgsce.2024.205464

A cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment for clean hydrogen gas production pathway using the CeO2/Ce2O3-based redox thermochemical cycle

2024· article· en· W4402782053 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGas Science and Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChemical Looping and Thermochemical Processes
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProduction (economics)RedoxLife-cycle assessmentHydrogen productionHydrogenEnvironmental scienceChemistryInorganic chemistryEconomicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The present study is conducted to develop a two-steps redox thermochemical cycle based on combined ceria reduction and methane reforming through the CeO 2 /Ce 2 O 3 redox pair. This cycle incorporates simultaneous water splitting for hydrogen production. To enhance the accuracy and reliability of the inventory data, the system is simulated using the Aspen Plus software package. Also, the goal of this work is to evaluate the carbon footprint of thermochemical based hydrogen production under different scenarios and to compare it with traditional technologies like steam methane reforming (SMR). The analysis takes into account both the plant manufacturing line (reactors), fuel processing (H 2 production), redox particles oxygen carrier manufacturing (OC), H 2 compression (power consumption) and H 2 storage (pipeline manufacturing). The openLCA software with the European database environmental footprint is employed to compute the total carbon emissions of this thermochemical cycle during its overall life cycle. The study concludes that the base case scenario of this system has an overall GWP of 1751.14 g CO 2 eq./kg H 2 respectively. In the overall GWP, the share of plant construction and OC production was found to be around 1.67%, and 15.78% respectively. The conventional steam methane reforming is loaded with an overall GWP of 4472.83 g CO 2 eq./kg H 2 . In terms of renewable energy input, the base case scenario of this hydrogen production system results in 1465.73 g CO 2 eq./kg H 2 with thermal energy produced from renewable sources. Comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) demonstrates that base case of CeO 2 /Ce 2 O 3 has an 85.41% lower GWP emphasizing its environmental advantages over the SMR and Fe 3 O 4 /FeO redox pair carries an 84.06% lower GWP as compared to the conventional SMR with 1483.55 g CO 2 eq./kg H 2 . The present study concludes that the combined ceria reduction and methane reforming chemical looping process with simultaneous water splitting may be a more promising option to produce hydrogen using renewable energy. • A new system is developed for cleaner hydrogen production using a thermochemical cycle. • The thermochemical cycle employs steps with CeO 2 /Ce 2 O 3 . • A life cycle assessment of CeO 2 /Ce 2 O 3 based thermochemical cycle is performed. • The proposed system achieves a 2.5-fold reduction in GWP compared to an SMR process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.266
Threshold uncertainty score0.657

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it