Effect of chronic sedative-hypnotic use on sleep architecture and brain oscillations in older adults with chronic insomnia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Rationale High rates of insomnia in older adults lead to widespread benzodiazepine (BZD) and benzodiazepine receptor agonist (BZRA) use, even though chronic use has been shown to disrupt sleep regulation and impact cognition. Little is known about sedative-hypnotic effects on NREM slow oscillations (SO) and spindles, including their coupling, which is crucial for memory, especially in the elderly. Objectives Our objective was to investigate the effect of chronic sedative-hypnotic use on sleep macro-architecture, EEG relative power, as well as SO and spindle characteristics and coupling. Methods One hundred and one individuals (66.05 ± 5.84 years, 73% female) completed a one-night study and were categorized into three groups: good sleepers (GS, n=28), individuals with insomnia (INS, n=26) or individuals with insomnia who chronically use either BZD or BZRA to manage their insomnia difficulties (MED, n=47; dose equivalent in Diazepam: 6.1 ± 3.8 mg/week). We performed a comprehensive comparison of sleep architecture, EEG relative spectrum, and associated brain oscillatory activities, focusing on NREM brain oscillations crucial for sleep-dependent memory consolidation (i.e., SO and spindles) and their temporal coupling. Results Chronic use of BZD/BZRA worsened sleep architecture and spectral activity compared to older adults with and without insomnia disorder. The use of BZD/BZRAs also altered the characteristics of sleep-related brain oscillations and their synchrony. An exploratory interaction model suggested that BZD use exacerbated sleep alterations compared to BZRA, and higher BZD/BZRA dosage worsened alteration in sleep micro-architecture and EEG spectrum. Conclusions Our results suggest that chronic use of sedative-hypnotics is detrimental to sleep when compared to drug-free GS and INS. Such alteration of sleep regulation – at the macro and micro-architectural levels - may contribute to the reported association between sedative-hypnotic use and cognitive impairment in older adults. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE Widespread use of sedative-hypnotics is driven by high insomnia rates among older adults. Chronic use can disrupt sleep and cognitive function, however, its impact on sleep regulation – at the macro and micro-architecture levels - is not well understood. We assessed the effect of chronic sedative-hypnotic use in older adults using a between-group design involving good sleepers, individuals with insomnia disorder who do not take any pharmacological treatment to manage their symptoms and individuals with insomnia disorder who chronically use sedative-hypnotics as a sleep aid. We performed a comprehensive comparison of sleep architecture, EEG relative spectrum, and associated NREM brain oscillations crucial for sleep-dependent memory consolidation (i.e., SO and spindles) and their temporal coupling. We showed that chronic use of sedative-hypnotics is detrimental to sleep regulation – at the macro and micro level - compared to drug-free GS and INS, and this may contribute to the reported link between sedative-hypnotic use and cognitive impairment in older adults.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".