MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402813087 · doi:10.1016/j.cscm.2024.e03795

Damage prediction and long-term cost performance analysis of glass fiber recycled concrete under freeze-thaw cycles

2024· article· en· W4402813087 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCase Studies in Construction Materials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRecycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
Canadian institutionsOkanagan University CollegeUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
FundersSpecialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of ChinaKey Research and Development Program of Jiangxi ProvinceNatural Science Foundation of Jiangxi ProvinceEducation Department of Jiangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGlass fiberTerm (time)Materials scienceComposite materialCost analysisFiberForensic engineeringStructural engineeringEngineeringReliability engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper establishes a freeze-thaw cycle damage model by analyzing the changes in mass, relative dynamic elastic modulus and compressive strength of glass fibers (0 %, 0.5 %, 1.0 %, and 1.5 %) recycled concrete after the freeze-thaw cycle (0, 50, 100, and 150) tests. Meanwhile, the antifreeze life of concrete is predicted based on the Weibull distribution model. The study show that glass fiber can reduce the deterioration of recycled concrete specimen surfaces result from frozen-thaw environment. After 150 freeze-thaw cycles, the specimens with 0.5 %, 1.0 %, and 1.5 % glass fiber content showed a reduction in mass loss of 0.405 %, 1.100 %, and 0.725 %, and an increase in compressive strength of 8.19 %, 21.35 %, and 17.79 %, respectively, when compared with the specimens without glass fiber. Fiber can provide tension when recycled concrete is compressed, thus improving compressive strength, and the optimum glass fiber content is 1.0 %. After 150 freeze-thaw cycles, the freeze-thaw damage of recycled concrete specimens with 1.0 % glass fiber content was the smallest. Compared with that before freeze-thaw, the mass of the specimens only decreased by 2.128 %, and the compressive strength decreased by 35.2 %. Finally, the long-term cost-effectiveness of Recycled Aggregate Concrete (RAC) is analyzed based on the predicted life, and the performance optimization and economic benefits are comprehensively considered. Therefore, the appropriate volumetric admixture of glass fiber can be selected according to the actual situation in different regions, considering the cost-effectiveness of glass fiber recycled concrete to provide suggestions for related research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.166
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it