MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

P.083: Biological sex modulates the effects of the immunoregulatory fibrinogen-like protein 2 molecule on alloimmunity.

2024· article· en· W4402818437 on OpenAlexaff
Christina Lam, Sajad Moshkelgosha, Nadia Sachewsky, S. Juvet

Bibliographic record

VenueTransplantation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDiabetes and associated disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlloimmunityFibrinogenImmunologyChemistryCell biologyMedicineAntibodyInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Latner Thoracic Research Laboratories. Introduction: Various factors contribute to patients’ outcomes in solid organ transplantation. Among them, the effects of sex differences remain poorly understood and understudied. We know that females tend to mount more robust immune responses compared to males due to estrogen in the former and androgen in the latter. The immunoregulatory fibrinogen-like protein 2 (fgl2) molecule, expressed by regulatory T cells (Tregs), holds potential as tolerizing therapy. Here, we tested the hypothesis that fgl2’s effect on the allograft response is sex dependent. Method: We first isolated T cells from males and female fgl2+/+ and fgl2-/- mice and measured their proliferation in vitro in response to plate-bound anti-CD3 and soluble anti-CD28. To investigate the influence of sex hormones in vivo, we also intravenously injected either fgl2+/+ or fgl2-/- T cells into Rag-/- (fgl2+/+) mice (C57BL/6J background; H-2b) and gave them skin grafts from Balb/c donors (H-2d) after 24 hours (Fig 1a). The sexes of Rag-/- recipients and Balb/c donors were matched to the T cells. Dressings were removed 7 days post-transplant and grafts were monitored for up to 90 days (Fig. 1a).Results: T cell-intrinsic fgl2 expression inhibited CD4+ T cell proliferation in vitro, but only in male T cells (Fig 1b). In contrast, while female CD8+ T cells tended to proliferate less than male T cells, T cell-intrinsic fgl2 did not have a strong effect on CD8+ T cell proliferation (Fig. 1b). In the adoptive transfer experiment, fgl2 expression by the T cells did not affect graft rejection; however, female T cells rejected Balb/c grafts faster than male T cells (Fig 2a-b). In keeping with the in vitro data suggesting that male but not female CD4+ T cells can be regulated by fgl2, this observation suggests that T cell extrinsic fgl2 in the Rag-/- environment may have contributed to slowing graft rejection mediated by male T cells.Conclusion: Our data reveal that fgl2 exerts its influence on allograft rejection in a sex-dependent manner and suggest that T cell-extrinsic sources of fgl2 can contribute to T cell regulation. Further investigation is now underway. Future studies of fgl2’s underlying mechanisms must incorporate biological sex as a variable. The authors would like to thank the UHN Foundation for making this work possible, along with the staffs at UHN’s Animal and Flow Cytometry facilities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransplantationSame topicDiabetes and associated disordersFrench-language works237,207