MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402821468 · doi:10.1002/app.56264

Novel amphiphilic rhamnogalacturonnan I‐based nanomicelles for targeted delivery of curcumin to hepatocellular carcinoma cells

2024· article· en· W4402821468 on OpenAlexaff
Yuejiao Wu, Jian Yang, Kefeng Shen, Liyan Liu, Jing Cao, Zhaomei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Polymer Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCurcumin's Biomedical Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersBasic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province
KeywordsCurcuminHepatocellular carcinomaAmphiphileChemistryCancer researchMedicineBiochemistryOrganic chemistryCopolymer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Curcumin (Cur) is a bioactive nutraceutical with great potential in biological, nutritional, and medical applications. However, these applications are limited by various factors such as insufficient ingestion, low aqueous solubility, and relatively high toxicity to normal cells. To tackle these obstacles, we synthesized a novel Cur‐modified‐rhamnogalacturonan (RG‐C) nano‐micelle carrier to target‐deliver Cur to hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells via specific recognition of RG‐I by the overexpressed surface galactin‐3 receptor. Fourier transfer infrared, UV–vis, and 1H NMR analyses confirmed the conjugation between RG and Cur RG‐C loaded with Cur (RG‐CC) was formed via self‐assembly in an aqueous solution with a drug loading efficiency of 12.2%. RG‐CC micelle was ellipsoidal or cubic with a size ranging between 100 and 200 nm by scanning electron microscopy observation. Cur release from RG‐CC exhibited a controlled and pH‐dependent manner with 50% at pH 5.0 in contrast to 5% at pH 7.4 after 24 h exposure. RG‐CC possessed more potent anti‐proliferative activity against HepG2 cells than normal embryonic kidney 293T cells. Compared to free Cur, both the anti‐proliferative effect and uptake of RG‐CC were significantly higher in HepG2 cells as revealed from laser confocal microscopy and flow cytometry analyses. RG‐CC was a promising anticancer candidate and deserves further preclinical and clinical investigations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Polymer ScienceSame topicCurcumin's Biomedical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207