MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402830987 · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adm8241

Inorganic interpretation of luminescent materials encountered by the Perseverance rover on Mars

2024· article· en· W4402830987 on OpenAlexaff
Eva L. Scheller, Tanja Bosak, F. M. McCubbin, Kenneth H. Williford, Sandra Siljeström, Ryan S. Jakubek, S. A. Eckley, R. V. Morris, Sergei V. Bykov, T. V. Kizovski, Sanford A. Asher, E. L. Berger, D. M. Bower, Emily Cardarelli, B. L. Ehlmann, Teresa Fornaro, Allison C. Fox, Nikole C. Haney, K. P. Hand, Ryan D. Roppel, Sunanda Sharma, A. Steele, Kyle Uckert, Anastasia Yanchilina, Olivier Beyssac, Kenneth A. Farley, Jesper Henneke, Christopher M. Heirwegh, David A. K. Pedersen, Yang Liu, M. E. Schmidt, Mark A. Sephton, David L. Shuster, B. P. Weiss

Bibliographic record

VenueScience Advances · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMars Exploration ProgramInterpretation (philosophy)AstrobiologyMars roverLuminescenceExploration of MarsLife on MarsGeologyRemote sensingComputer scienceMaterials scienceBiologyMartianOptoelectronicsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A major objective of the Mars 2020 mission is to sample rocks in Jezero crater that may preserve organic matter for later return to Earth. Using an ultraviolet Raman and luminescence spectrometer, the Perseverance rover detected luminescence signals with maximal intensities at 330 to 350 nanometers and 270 to 290 nanometers that were initially reported as consistent with organics. Here, we test the alternative hypothesis that the 330- to 350-nanometer and 270- to 290-nanometer luminescence signals trace Ce 3+ in phosphate and silicate defects, respectively. By comparing the distributions of luminescence signals with the rover detections of x-ray fluorescence from P 2 O 5 and Si-bearing materials, we show that, while an organic origin is not excluded, the observed luminescence can be explained by purely inorganic materials. These findings highlight the importance of eventual laboratory analyses to detect and characterize organic compounds in the returned samples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.167

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueScience AdvancesSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207