MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

ASCHOPLEX: A generalizable approach for the automatic segmentation of choroid plexus

2024· article· en· W4402831313 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Valentina Visani, Mattia Veronese, Francesca B. Pizzini, Annalisa Colombi, Valerio Natale, Corina Marjin, Agnese Tamanti, Julia Schubert, Noha Althubaity, Inés Bedmar-Gómez, Neil A. Harrison, Edward T. Bullmore, Federico Turkheimer, Massimiliano Calabrese, Marco Castellaro

Bibliographic record

VenueComputers in Biology and Medicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research CentreOxford Health NHS Foundation TrustH. Lundbeck A/SRijksuniversiteit GroningenUniversity of GlasgowUniversity of OxfordKing's College LondonUniversity of SouthamptonNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchWellcome TrustUniversity of TorontoNIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research CentreGlaxoSmithKlinePfizer
KeywordsChoroid plexusComputer scienceSegmentationArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMedicineInternal medicineCentral nervous system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Choroid Plexus (ChP) plays a vital role in brain homeostasis, serving as part of the Blood-Cerebrospinal Fluid Barrier, contributing to brain clearance pathways and being the main source of cerebrospinal fluid. Since the involvement of ChP in neurological and psychiatric disorders is not entirely established and currently under investigation, accurate and reproducible segmentation of this brain structure on large cohorts remains challenging. This paper presents ASCHOPLEX, a deep-learning tool for the automated segmentation of human ChP from structural MRI data that integrates existing software architectures like 3D UNet, UNETR, and DynUNet to deliver accurate ChP volume estimates. Here we trained ASCHOPLEX on 128 T1-w MRI images comprising both controls and patients with Multiple Sclerosis. ASCHOPLEX’s performances were evaluated using traditional segmentation metrics; manual segmentation by experts served as ground truth. To overcome the generalizability problem that affects data-driven approaches, an additional fine-tuning procedure (ASCHOPLEX tune ) was implemented on 77 T1-w PET/MRI images of both controls and depressed patients. ASCHOPLEX showed superior performance compared to commonly used methods like FreeSurfer and Gaussian Mixture Model both in terms of Dice Coefficient (ASCHOPLEX 0.80, ASCHOPLEX tune 0.78) and estimated ChP volume error (ASCHOPLEX 9.22%, ASCHOPLEX tune 9.23%). These results highlight the high accuracy, reliability, and reproducibility of ASCHOPLEX ChP segmentations. • ASCHOPLEX is a novel DL-based tool for the Choroid Plexus automatic segmentation. • Generalizability is guaranteed thanks to a fine-tuning step validated on an unseen dataset. • The final user can fine-tune ASCHOPLEX with no additional code. • ASCHOPLEX is more accurate, reliable, and reproducible compared to state-of-the-art approaches. • ASCHOPLEX code and trained models are totally freely available to ensure reproducibility.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComputers in Biology and MedicineSame topicCerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusFrench-language works237,207