MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Development of Photon-to-Digital Converters -- A 3D Integrated Digital Single- Photon Detector

2024· article· en· W4402833701 on OpenAlexaff
K. Deslandes, F. Vachon, T. Rossignol, Samuel Parent, N. Roy, C. Pépin, Olivier Lepage, L. Fabris, Paul Hausladen, F. Retière, J.‐F. Pratte, Serge A. Charlebois

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors
Canadian institutionsTRIUMFInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvertersDetectorPhotonPhysicsComputer scienceTwo-photon excitation microscopyOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop 3D integrated photon-to-digital converters (PDC) aimed to replace PMTs and SiPMs in various radiation science applications. In previous years we reported on a CMOS readout electronics designed for low power consumption in large area systems such as noble liquid dark matter or neutrino searches, or fast neutron spectroscopy. System integration of these PDCs has also been demonstrated. We also reported on the development of the SPAD technology optimized for precise timing at wavelengths below 500~nm and specifically designed to be 3D integrated onto the CMOS readout. A comprehensive test platform allows performing all SPAD testing in Geiger mode on either dies or wafers was also demonstrated. A revised CMOS readout modified to ease large system integration was designed. Wafers of this readout were produced and we are presently characterizing them to study performance variations on and across wafers. We also discuss the challenges of resizing and matching patterns between TSMC wafers and our custom SPAD layer. Recently, we have completed key milestones with wafer-to-wafer bonding of mock-up SPAD wafers onto resized but otherwise unprocessed TSMC CMOS wafers. We are proceeding with the bonding of functional SPAD wafers onto CMOS readout wafers to complete the first lot of 3D PDCs. We will report on their fabrication, on the CMOS readout operation, and on the SPAD performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.590
Threshold uncertainty score0.700

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCCD and CMOS Imaging SensorsFrench-language works237,207