MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402844084 · doi:10.31083/j.rcm2509339

Aortic Stiffness Measured by Carotid Femoral-Pulse Wave Velocity at Different Stages of Normal Glucose, Prediabetes, and Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2024· review· en· W4402844084 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiao Liang, Dongdong Li, Zhen Wang, Yuxin Cheng, Ke Mou, Chenyu Ye, Yun-you Duan, Yong Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Cardiovascular Medicine · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersKey Research and Development Projects of Shaanxi Province
KeywordsPulse wave velocityMedicinePrediabetesInternal medicineCardiologyPublication biasMeta-analysisDiabetes mellitusConfidence intervalIntima-media thicknessArterial stiffnessCarotid arteriesEndocrinologyType 2 diabetesBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: To explore aortic stiffness measured by carotid femoral-pulse wave velocity (cf-PWV) at different stages of normal glucose, prediabetes, and diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods: The literature comparing aortic stiffness (AS) with cf-PWV between DM and non-DM samples was systematically retrieved from Pubmed, Ovid Medline, Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, CNKI, and Wanfang databases. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of the literature. The primary endpoint was the mean difference (MD) of cf-PWV between the normal glucose and DM samples and normal glucose and prediabetes samples. The secondary endpoints were the MD of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and carotid-radial pulse wave velocity (cr-PWV). Aggregated MD and 95% confidence intervals were calculated. When the I2 value was >50% or p < 0.01, the heterogeneity was considered large, and the random-effect model was used; otherwise, the fixed-effect model was used. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to identify the source of heterogeneity, and a funnel plot and the regression Egger test was utilized to assess the publication bias. Results: A total of 37 studies were finally enrolled. Samples with DM had a higher cf-PWV value and cIMT value than those without DM, and the differences were statistically significant. The cr-PWV measurements tended to be higher in the DM group than in the non-DM group, but the difference was not significant. Samples with prediabetes also had a significantly higher cf-PWV value than samples with normal glucose. Conclusions: Samples with DM and prediabetes were associated with a higher cf-PWV value, indicating that DM patients had a higher central AS. Central AS progresses at the prediabetes stage. These data provide insight into understanding the mechanism of adverse effects of DM and prediabetes on artery stiffness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.025
Bibliometrics0.0070.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReviews in Cardiovascular MedicineSame topicCardiovascular Health and Disease PreventionFrench-language works237,207