MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402854716 · doi:10.2471/blt.23.290540

Implications of living evidence syntheses in health policy

2024· article· en· W4402854716 on OpenAlexaff
Samantha Chakraborty, Tanja Kuchenmüller, John N. Lavis, Fadi El‐Jardali, Laurenz Mahlanza-Langer, Sally Green, Ludovic Reveiz, Victoria Carter, Emma McFarlane, Lisa Askie, Fiona Glen, Tari Turner

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin of the World Health Organization · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Policy Implementation Science
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersWorld Health Organization
KeywordsMedicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.603
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.857
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.397
Threshold uncertainty score0.489

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.6030.857
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.005
Bibliometrics0.0190.017
Science and technology studies0.0120.064
Scholarly communication0.0410.067
Open science0.0100.025
Research integrity0.0290.033
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.301
GPT teacher head0.592
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueBulletin of the World Health OrganizationSame topicHealth Policy Implementation ScienceFrench-language works237,207