MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402858107 · doi:10.1016/j.cmicom.2024.105038

Examining hypoglycemia risk with systemic fluoroquinolone use: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2024· review· en· W4402858107 on OpenAlexaff
Irene Jiayu Guo, Mira Maximos, John‐Michael Gamble

Bibliographic record

VenueCMI Communications · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypoglycemiaMeta-analysisMedicineSystemic riskIntensive care medicineInternal medicineInsulinEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Hypoglycemia associated with fluoroquinolone use has been observed in several case reports and observational studies. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Two independent reviewers screened studies identified from a literature search conducted using PubMed (Medline), Cochrane Library, and Ovid Embase databases from inception to June 24, 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-control studies that reported quantitative findings regarding hypoglycemia and had a non-fluoroquinolone antimicrobial comparator. Random effects models were used to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for the occurrence of hypoglycemia in people prescribed fluoroquinolones (at a class and individual agent level) versus active comparators for RCTs and observational studies. Subgroup analysis by diabetes status, concurrent use of hypoglycemic agents, renal impairment, and age were conducted. Results: There were 1771 citations screened of which 21 studies (9 RCTs and 12 observational) were included. Compared to other antimicrobials, fluoroquinolones were associated with an overall significantly increased risk of hypoglycemia across the RCTs (9 studies, Pooled OR = 1.84; 95 % CI 1.05–3.21; I2 = 0 %). Findings from observational studies showed an increased risk of hypoglycemia with gatifloxacin (5 studies, Pooled OR = 2.87; 95 % CI 1.65–4.99; I2 = 65 %) and levofloxacin (7 studies, Pooled OR = 1.90; 95 % CI 1.46–2.47; I2 = 75 %), but not with ciprofloxacin (6 studies, Pooled OR = 1.24; 95 % CI 0.97–1.59; I2 = 76 %) nor moxifloxacin (5 studies, Pooled OR = 1.28; 95 % CI 0.83–1.97; I2 = 67 %) compared to non-fluoroquinolone antimicrobials. Limitations: Inconsistencies in the definition of hypoglycemia, heterogeneity between observational studies, and hypoglycemia was not a primary outcome in any RCTs. Conclusion: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed a significant association between fluoroquinolones and an increased risk of hypoglycemia, although there appears to be intraclass variation. As hypoglycemia is a serious adverse drug event associated with cognitive and cardiovascular complications, fluoroquinolones should be prescribed cautiously, particularly when safer antibiotic alternatives are available.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.048
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.048
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0200.051
Bibliometrics0.0110.010
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.268
GPT teacher head0.411
Teacher spread0.143 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCMI CommunicationsSame topicAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyFrench-language works237,207