MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402861328 · doi:10.1097/cce.0000000000001160

Antiseizure Medications in Adult Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

2024· review· en· W4402861328 on OpenAlexaff
Federico Angriman, Shaurya Taran, Natalia Angeloni, Catherine Devion, Jong Woo Lee, Neill K. J. Adhikari

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Explorations · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Work & HealthToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRelative riskTraumatic brain injuryPlaceboRandomized controlled trialMeta-analysisLevetiracetamPhenytoinConfidence intervalInternal medicinePediatricsEpilepsyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the effectiveness of any antiseizure medication on the incidence of early post-traumatic seizures among adult patients with traumatic brain injury. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and LILACS were searched from inception to October 2023. STUDY SELECTION: We included randomized trials of adult patients with traumatic brain injury evaluating any antiseizure medication compared with either placebo or another agent. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted individual study data and evaluated studies for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Our main outcome of interest was the occurrence of early seizures (i.e., within 7 d); secondary outcomes included late-seizures and all-cause mortality. DATA SYNTHESIS: Bayesian network meta-analyses were used to derive risk ratios (RRs) alongside 95% credible intervals (CrIs). We used Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology to rate the certainty in our findings. Overall, ten individual randomized controlled trials (1851 participants) were included. Compared with placebo, phenytoin (RR, 0.28; 95% CrI, 0.13-0.57; moderate certainty) and levetiracetam (RR, 0.20; 95% CrI, 0.07-0.60; moderate certainty) were associated with a reduction in the risk of early seizures. Carbamazepine may be associated with a reduced risk of early seizures, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR, 0.41; 95% CrI, 0.12-1.27; very low certainty). Valproic acid may result in little to no difference in the risk of early seizures, but the evidence is very uncertain (RR, 0.97; 95% CrI, 0.16-9.00; very low certainty). The evidence is very uncertain about the impact of any antiseizure medication on the risk of late seizures or all-cause mortality at longest reported follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS: Phenytoin or levetiracetam reduce the risk of early seizures among adult patients with traumatic brain injury. Further research is needed to evaluate required duration of therapy and long-term safety profiles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.779
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.098
GPT teacher head0.387
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care ExplorationsSame topicTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesFrench-language works237,207