Strategic partnerships in the implementation of bonded recycling zones to support circular economy in Banten, Indonesia
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to explore the strategic partnerships role of Bonded Recycling Zones (KDUB) in facilitating Indonesia's transition to a circular economy and enhancing sustainable development. Utilizing a qualitative research approach, the study employs in-depth interviews with key stakeholders from various government agencies and the recycling industry, alongside a comprehensive analysis of policy documents. The findings reveal significant opportunities within the KDUB framework, yet also highlight critical gaps in inter-agency coordination, particularly in monitoring and evaluation processes, which are vital for aligning recycling practices with national strategic objectives and environmental standards. The research also underscores the positive impact of fiscal incentives on the recycling sector, while identifying the necessity for more efficient licensing procedures and clearer regulatory guidelines. This study offers original insights into the complexities of policy implementation in the context of circular economy initiatives, providing valuable recommendations for enhancing the effectiveness of KDUB policies and fostering stronger governmental collaboration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it