Genetic Isolation among Four Lineages of <i>Silene nutans</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Speciation is the process leading to the emergence of new species. While being usually progressive, it can sometimes be fast with rapid emergence of reproductive barriers leading to high level of reproductive isolation. Some reproductive barriers might leave signatures in the genome, through elevated level of genetic differentiation at specific loci. Similar signatures might also be the results of linked selection acting in low recombination regions. Nottingham catchfly (Silene nutans) is a Caryophyllaceae species composed of four genetically differentiated lineages for which strong and asymmetric levels of reproductive isolation have been identified. Using population transcriptomic data from several individuals of the four lineages, we inferred the best evo-demographic scenario leading to the current reproductive isolation of these four lineages. We also tested whether loci exhibiting high level of genetic differentiation represented barrier loci or were located in low recombination regions, evolving under strong influence of linked selection. Overall, the four lineages of S. nutans have diverged in strict isolation, likely during the different glacial period, through migration in distinct glacial refugia. Speciation between these four lineages appeared to be particularly fast, likely due to fast evolving plastid genome accelerating plastid-nuclear co-evolution and the probability of plastid-nuclear incompatibilities in inter-lineage hybrids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".