MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402889100 · doi:10.1093/ismejo/wrae188

Hidden syndinian and perkinsid infections in dinoflagellate hosts revealed by single-cell transcriptomics

2024· article· en· W4402889100 on OpenAlexafffund
Elizabeth C. Cooney, Brian S. Leander, Patrick J. Keeling

Bibliographic record

VenueThe ISME Journal · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicProtist diversity and phylogeny
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaHakai InstituteGordon and Betty Moore Foundation
KeywordsBiologyDinoflagellateCladeHost (biology)TranscriptomeParasite hostingEvolutionary biologyGeneLineage (genetic)Sister groupGenomePhylogeneticsGeneticsEcologyGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Free-living core dinoflagellates are commonly infected by members of two parasitic clades that are themselves closely related to dinoflagellates, the marine alveolates and perkinsids. These parasites are abundant and ecologically important, but most species have been difficult to observe directly or cultivate, so our knowledge of them is usually restricted to environmental 18S rRNA gene sequences, as genome-scale molecular data are not available for most species. Here, we report the finding of several of these parasites infecting free-living dinoflagellates. Of the 14 infected host cells collected, only five were identified as containing parasites via light microscopy at the time of collection. Single-cell transcriptome sequencing yielded relatively high transcriptomic coverage for parasites as well as their hosts. Host and parasite homologs were distinguished phylogenetically, allowing us to infer a robust phylogenomic tree based on 192 genes. The tree showed one parasite belongs to an undescribed lineage that is sister to perkinsids, whereas the remainder are members of the syndinian clade within the marine alveolates. Close relatives of all these parasites have been observed in 18S rRNA gene surveys, but until now none had been linked to a specific host. These findings illustrate the efficacy of single-cell isolation and transcriptome sequencing as strategies for gaining deeper insights into the evolutionary history and host relationships of hidden single-celled parasites.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe ISME JournalSame topicProtist diversity and phylogenyFrench-language works237,207