MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402893717 · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2024.3460386

Finite-Frequency Fault Estimation and Adaptive Event-Triggered Fault-Tolerant Consensus for LPV Multiagent Systems

2024· article· en· W4402893717 on OpenAlexaff
Shanglin Li, Yangzhou Chen, Peter Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDistributed systems and fault tolerance
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersBeijing Municipal Natural Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMulti-agent systemFault toleranceComputer scienceConsensusFault (geology)Control theory (sociology)Distributed computingArtificial intelligenceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article investigates the problem of finite-frequency fault estimation (FE) and adaptive event-triggered fault-tolerant consensus for linear parameter-varying multiagent systems. A polytopic parameter-varying framework is introduced to represent the dynamics of each agent with internal model perturbation and parameter uncertainties. In order to reduce the conservatism brought by full-frequency domain approaches, the finite-frequency technique is employed to design a FE observer that can estimate the magnitude of faults. To eliminate/reduce the impact of faults on system performance, an adaptive event-triggered fault-tolerant consensus controller is then developed, which adjusts the consensus protocol based on the FE information. With the developed distributed fault-tolerant protocol and adaptive event-triggered control scheme, the agents can reach consensus in the presence of system faults and the transmission of unnecessary information in the control channels is avoided. The proposed triggering scheme offers certain advantages over existing results in balancing desired consensus performance and improving network utilization. By constructing a parameter-dependent Lyapunov function, a sufficient condition for designing the consensus controller gain and the adjustment matrix can be derived in the form of linear matrix inequality. Finally, two simulation examples are included to illustrate the effectiveness of the obtained theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsSame topicDistributed systems and fault toleranceFrench-language works237,207