Empowering Remote and Off-Grid Renewable Energy Communities: Case Studies in Congo, Australia, and Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aims to explore the feasibility of establishing self-sufficient electricity generation systems in off-grid remote communities using renewable energy sources. It provides an overview of current trends and developments in Renewable Energy Communities worldwide, with a focus on remote locations. To assess the technical feasibility, simulations were conducted using PVGIS for irradiation data and a load generator for energy consumption data. Different scenarios combining photovoltaic modules with lithium-ion battery systems were simulated using a dedicated optimization model developed in the PYTHON environment. The simulations aimed to size the entire system for three distinct locations: Congo, Australia, and Canada. The optimal number of PV modules determined for each location was 50 for Congo and 55 for Australia, and the battery system sizes were found to be 225 kWh and 150 kWh, respectively, admitting usual practices for the energy not supplied. The results obtained regarding Canada pointed to a system difficult to justify from an economic standpoint due to challenging weather conditions, namely, the existence of several consecutive days without irradiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".