MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402900266 · doi:10.3390/diagnostics14192151

Hospital Re-Admission Prediction Using Named Entity Recognition and Explainable Machine Learning

2024· article· en· W4402900266 on OpenAlexafffund
Safaâ Dafrallah, Moulay A. Akhloufi

Bibliographic record

VenueDiagnostics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMachine Learning in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceTransformerMachine learningGradient boostingEncoderBoosting (machine learning)Named-entity recognitionEmergency departmentMedicineEngineeringRandom forest

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Early hospital readmission refers to unplanned emergency admission of patients within 30 days of discharge. Predicting early readmission risk before discharge can help to reduce the cost of readmissions for hospitals and decrease the death rate for Intensive Care Unit patients. In this paper, we propose a novel approach for prediction of unplanned hospital readmissions using discharge notes from the MIMIC-III database. This approach is based on first extracting relevant information from clinical reports using a pretrained Named Entity Recognition model called BioMedical-NER, which is built on Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers architecture, with the extracted features then used to train machine learning models to predict unplanned readmissions. Our proposed approach achieves better results on clinical reports compared to the state-of-the-art methods, with an average precision of 88.4% achieved by the Gradient Boosting algorithm. In addition, explainable Artificial Intelligence techniques are applied to provide deeper comprehension of the predictive results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.974
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiagnosticsSame topicMachine Learning in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207