Growing Jatropha curcas L. Improves the Chemical Characteristics of Degraded Tropical Soils
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Intensive agriculture in tropical regions is the main cause of soil impoverishment, reducing its productivity. Studies based on soil restoration methods are being implemented, including the use of plants such as Jatropha curcas L., which could have the capacity to improve the agronomic properties of degraded soils in the tropics. The aim of this study is, therefore, to demonstrate that J. curcas L. can improve the characteristics of degraded tropical soil. Between October 2019 and November 2022, we evaluated the effect of spacing, planting material type and age, as well as their interactions, on carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) concentrations and pH at two depths (i.e., 0–10 and 10–20 cm) in the soil. The results reveal that after three years of J. curcas L. growth, C concentration and soil pH increased significantly (p < 0.001) at both depths, while N concentration increased significantly between 0 and 10 cm only. Plants grown from cuttings improved soil pH at 10–20 cm depth more (p = 0.012) than those grown from seeds. Three years after planting, soil N concentration under J. curcas reached a value comparable to that of undisturbed adjacent soil. Overall, our results indicate that J. curcas is a plant that can contribute effectively to restoring degraded tropical soils, therefore contributing to limiting the deforestation of natural forests.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it