Advantages of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the management of ANCA-associated vasculitis patients with suspected pulmonary infection as a rule-out tool
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary infection is one of the leading causes of death in patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). It is sometimes difficult to differentiate pulmonary infection from pulmonary involvement of vasculitis in AAV patients. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) assays are useful diagnostic methods. In addition to conventional microbiological tests (CMTs), metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) facilitates rapid and sensitive detection of various pathogens. The current study aimed to evaluate the advantages of additional BALF mNGS in the management of pulmonary infection in AAV patients. METHODS: 27 patients with active AAV and suspected pulmonary infection whose BALF samples were tested by mNGS and CMTs and 17 active AAV patients whose BALF were tested by CMTs alone were retrospectively recruited. The results of microbiological tests, and adjustments of treatment following BALF mNGS, were described. The durations of antimicrobial treatment and in-hospital mortality in patients were compared. RESULTS: Among the 27 patients whose BALF samples were tested by mNGS, 25.9% of patients did not have evidence of pathogenic microorganism in their BALF samples, 55.6% had polymicrobial infections, including bacteria, fungi and viruses. Of these 27 patients, 40.7% did not have evidence of pathogenic microorganism in their BALF or serum samples according to CMTs. Patients in the BALF mNGS/CMT group received a significantly shorter duration of antibacterial and total antimicrobial treatment than patients in the CMT alone group (17.3 ± 14.7 vs. 27.9 ± 19.0 days, P = 0.044; 18.9 ± 15.0 vs. 29.5 ± 17.7 days, P = 0.040, respectively). Fewer patients in the BALF mNGS/CMT group died than in the CMT alone group (4/27 vs. 7/17, P = 0.049). CONCLUSION: Compared with CMT alone, additional mNGS tests may shorten the duration of antimicrobial treatment and possibly decrease death from severe infection by providing precise and quick diagnosis of infection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".