MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402901718 · doi:10.1007/s43621-024-00474-1

Performance analysis of a 400-Gbps DWDM-FSO system using advanced modulation formats and under adverse weather conditions

2024· article· en· W4402901718 on OpenAlexaff
Hafiz Muhammad Obaid, Zaid Bin Javaid, Tehseen Mazhar, Muhammad Asgher Nadeem, Mamoon M. Saeed, Habib Hamam

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscover Sustainability · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdverse weatherModulation (music)Wavelength-division multiplexingComputer scienceTelecommunicationsElectronic engineeringOptoelectronicsMeteorologyEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Free space optical (FSO) systems offer an attractive and cost-effective solution for providing communication services in remote regions, as they allow secure transmission without the need for licensing and with lower deployment costs. However, the performance of FSO systems can be significantly impacted by atmospheric turbulences, creating considerable challenges to their deployment. To meet the expanding bandwidth requirements in optical networks, dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) has emerged as a viable option. The development of a 400-Gbps DWDM-FSO system with advanced modulation formats is the subject of this paper. To ensure efficient energy conservation in such a system, power consumption needs to be minimized while maintaining performance level; this calls for optimization of different components within the system. The system is made up of 10 channels and each channel can transmit data at 40 Gbps. Various modulation schemes like carrier-suppressed return-to-zero, modified duo binary return-to-zero, differential phase shift keying, and duo binary return-to-zero are studied for their impact on system performance parameters Q-factor and bit error rate (BER) in C-band around 1550 nm wavelengths. The assessment is also extended to the effects that changing FSO length, input power, and data rate have on these two parameters as well as an evaluation regarding how differing atmospheric conditions influence the FSO system’s effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscover SustainabilitySame topicOptical Wireless Communication TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207