MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402905290 · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000035714

Meta-analysis of FTO expression on the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis of gastric cancer

2024· review· en· W4402905290 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ciba Zhu, Mingxu Da, Ziyao Wu, Jichun Ma, Chenglou Zhu, Xinqiao An, Dandan Ji, Chunling Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Risks and Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicineMeta-analysisCochrane LibraryPathologicalCancerObesityOncologyMEDLINEGastroenterology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Fat mass and obesity-related gene (FTO) is aberrantly expressed in various cancers including highly expressed in gastric cancer tissues. The aim of this meta-analysis was to explore the effect of FTO expression on clinicopathological and prognostic outcome of gastric cancer. METHODS: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNK), Wanfang database, VIP database, Chinese biomedical literature database (CBM), PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane library and EMBASE database were searched to screen the literatures according to the inclusion criteria. The search time was the database establishment until May 2023. The two researchers independently searched and screened the literature, extracted pathological data, and conducted The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) quality evaluation. Analyze the correlation between FTO and pathological indicators of gastric cancer patients and the impact on prognosis, use and Stata 12.0, software for Meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1619 patients were studied in this study. The results of the Meta-analysis showed that higher expression levels of FTO were associated with TMN stage (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.11-3.03, P = .019), liver metastases (OR = 3.73, 95% CI: 1.49-9.31, P = .005), vascular invasion (OR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.36-3.61, P = .001), poorer overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.34-0.58, P < .001) and recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.40-0.73, P < .001) in gastric cancer patients. There was no significant relationship with the degree of differentiation (OR = 1.08, 95% CI: 0.49-2.35, P = .852), age (OR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.71-1.11, P = .306), and gender (OR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.74-1.14, P = .432). CONCLUSION: High expression of FTO was associated with risk of distant metastases and poor prognosis for patients with gastric cancer. FTO may be a potential prognostic biomarker for gastric cancer, but due to the limited number of literature, the above results need further research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.016
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.039
Bibliometrics0.0040.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.401
GPT teacher head0.473
Teacher spread0.072 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicineSame topicCancer Risks and FactorsFrench-language works237,207