MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402905889 · doi:10.1167/jov.24.10.1251

Brain Responses to Symmetries in Naturalistic Novel Three-Dimensional Objects

2024· article· en· W4402905889 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Automated Systems
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHomogeneous spaceComputer scienceNeurosciencePsychologyMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Symmetries are prevalent in natural and man-made objects and scenes. During natural vision, symmetries in the world are subject to perspective-distortion and rarely produce symmetrical images on the retina. Here we used high-density EEG to investigate the ability of the human visual system to overcome such distortions, by measuring responses to images of naturalistic, novel, 3D objects. Our paradigm used Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials (SSVEPs) to isolate brain activity specific to symmetry processing. We presented images of symmetrical and asymmetrical objects under two viewing conditions: One that produced symmetries in the image plane, and another where objects were rotated such that symmetries would be distorted in the resulting image. In each stimulus cycle, an asymmetrical object image was shown followed by a second image, either symmetrical or, in a control condition, another asymmetrical image. Image pairs for each cycle were selected so activity in a deep convolutional neural network trained to classify object categories (VGG16; Simonyan and Zisserman, 2015) was similarly matched between all image-pairs. We showed 10 cycles per trial, at a stimulation frequency of 1 Hz. In a follow-up experiment, the shading cues to 3D shape were removed from the images. In the resulting 2D object silhouettes, perspective-distorted symmetry cannot be detected. We analyzed the SSVEP data in three electrode regions-of-interest over occipital cortex and left and right temporal cortex, defined based on independent data. The results showed that during passive viewing, perspective-distorted symmetry can elicit measurable symmetry-specific SSVEPs, but compared to image-plane symmetry they are weaker, more anterior and possibly more right-lateralized, consistent with responses in higher-level visual cortex. The 2D stimuli elicited similar responses to 3D for image-plane symmetry, but as expected, produced no symmetry responses for perspective-distorted symmetry. Future work will determine how task manipulations may influence responses to these stimuli.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.478
Threshold uncertainty score0.270

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it