MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402910180 · doi:10.3168/jds.2024-25164

Effect of prolactin concentration during the dry period on the subsequent milk production of dairy cows

2024· article· en· W4402910180 on OpenAlexafffund
S. Lanctôt, A-M. Deacon, C. Thibault, Richard Blouin, P. Lacasse

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dairy Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaDairy Farmers of Canada
KeywordsMilk productionProlactinAnimal scienceDairy cattlePeriod (music)LactationFood scienceChemistryBiologyPregnancyHormoneEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shortening the dry period has a negative effect on milk production of the following lactation. One possible explanation is that a period of low prolactin (PRL) concentration is necessary to restore mammary gland milk production capacity. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine the effect of lowering blood PRL level on subsequent lactation milk production. In this experiment, quinagolide was used to inhibit PRL secretion during the dry period. Thirty Holstein cows were randomly assigned one of 3 dry period managements: a conventional (60 d) dry period (CD) and 2 short (35 d) dry period treatments (SDP). Short dry period cows received either water (SDwater) or quinagolide (2 mg, SDquin) injections twice daily from dry-off until 14 d before calving. Cows were followed during the first 20 wk of the subsequent lactation. When CD cows were dry but SDP cows were lactating, concentration of PRL was lower in the CD cows than in the SDP cows. During the injection period, PRL of SDquin cows was lower than that of the other treatments and was greater in the blood of SDwater than in that of CD cows. After the injection period until calving, no difference in PRL concentration was observed between treatments. After calving, PRL concentration of the SDquin cows was greater than those of CD and SDwater cows. During the first 20 wk of lactation, ECM was lower in SDwater cows than in CD and SDquin cows. The ECM of the latter groups were not different. During the same period, mammary expression of genes related to milk synthesis, pro-apoptotic genes, as well as the expression of the short and long isoforms of the PRLR genes were not affected; however, the expression of SOCS3 gene tended to be lower for the SDquin than the SDwater cows. Lowering the PRL level during short dry period restored milk production to the level normally observed after a conventional dry period, which suggests that higher PRL levels during short dry period are the cause of the lower milk production after a short dry period. Ultimately, strategies to lower blood PRL level may help the adoption of short dry period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dairy ScienceSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207