ShadowRefiner: Towards Mask-free Shadow Removal via Fast Fourier Transformer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Shadow-affected images often exhibit pronounced spatial discrepancies in color and illumination, consequently degrading various vision applications including object detection and segmentation systems. To effectively eliminate shadows in real-world images while preserving intricate details and producing visually compelling outcomes, we introduce a mask-free Shadow Removal and Refinement network (ShadowRefiner) via Fast Fourier Transformer. Specifically, the Shadow Removal module in our method aims to establish effective mappings between shadow-affected and shadow-free images via spatial and frequency representation learning. To mitigate the pixel misalignment and further improve the image quality, we propose a novel Fast-Fourier Attention based Transformer (FFAT) architecture, where an innovative attention mechanism is designed for meticulous refinement. Our method wins the championship in the Perceptual Track and achieves the second best performance in the Fidelity Track of NTIRE 2024 Image Shadow Removal Challenge. Besides, comprehensive experiment result also demonstrate the compelling effectiveness of our proposed method. The code is publicly available: https://github.com/movingforward100/Shadow_R.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it