Early stopping versus continued retrievals after failed recanalization: associated factors and implications for outcome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Successful recanalization defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction Score (mTICI) ≥2b is not achieved in 15%-20% of patients with acute ischemic stroke. This study aims to identify patient-specific factors associated with early stopping without successful recanalization. We hypothesized that the probability of the decision for early stopping during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is higher in patients with an unfavorable prognosis. METHODS: All patients enrolled in the German Stroke Registry (GSR) between June 2015 and December 2021 were screened. Inclusion criteria were stroke in the anterior circulation and availability of relevant clinical data. For each retrieval attempt 1-3, patients with stopping and failed reperfusion (mTICI <2b) were compared with all patients with continued retrieval attempts using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Our study included 2977 patients, 350 (12%) of which had early stopping. Higher pre-stroke Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) =1.20 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.09; 1.32), P<0.001), higher age (aOR=1.01 (1.00; 1.02), P=0.017) and distal occlusions (aOR=1.93 (1.50; 2.47), P<0.001) as well as intraprocedural dissections/perforations (aOR=4.61 (2.95; 7.20), P<0.001) and extravasation (aOR=2.43 (1.55;3.82), P<0.001) were associated with early stopping. In patients with unsuccessful recanalization (n=622), the number of retrieval attempts (aOR=1.05 (0.94; 1.18), p=0.405) was not associated with unfavorable outcomes (90d-mRS>3). CONCLUSION: The probability of early stopping was higher in patients with clinical conditions associated with: a) Favorable prognosis and assumed lower impact of recanalization success on functional status, such as distal occlusions; and b) Unfavorable prognosis, such as higher age and reduced pre-stroke functional status. Adverse events during the procedure increased the probability of early stopping. The number of recanalization attempts did not increase the risk of unfavorable outcome for patients with persistent occlusion, supporting the decision for continuation of retrieval attempts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".