MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402922385 · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105362

Bifidobacterium longum and microbiome maturation modify a nutrient intervention for stunting in Zimbabwean infants

2024· article· en· W4402922385 on OpenAlexaff
Ethan Gough, Thaddeus J. Edens, Lynnea Carr, Ruairi C. Robertson, Kuda Mutasa, Robert Ntozini, Bernard Chasekwa, Hyun Min Geum, Iman Baharmand, Sandeep K. Gill, Batsirai Mutasa, Mduduzi N. N. Mbuya, Florence D. Majo, Naume V. Tavengwa, Freddy Francis, Joice Tome, Ceri Evans, Margaret Kosek, Andrew J. Prendergast, Amee R. Manges

Bibliographic record

VenueEBioMedicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicChild Nutrition and Water Access
Canadian institutionsBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institutes of HealthNutricia Research FoundationWellcome TrustUNICEFDirektion für Entwicklung und ZusammenarbeitDepartment for International DevelopmentBill and Melinda Gates Foundation
KeywordsBifidobacterium longumMicrobiomeMedicineBifidobacteriumGut microbiomeMalnutritionBiologyIntervention (counseling)BioinformaticsLactobacillusBacteriaInternal medicineGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements (SQ-LNS), which has been widely tested to reduce child stunting, has largely modest effects to date, but the mechanisms underlying these modest effects are unclear. Child stunting is a longstanding indicator of chronic undernutrition and it remains a prevalent public health problem. The infant gut microbiome may be a key contributor to stunting; and mother and infant fucosyltransferase (FUT) phenotypes are important determinants of infant microbiome composition. METHODS: We investigated whether mother-infant FUT status (n = 792) and infant gut microbiome composition (n = 354 fecal specimens from 172 infants) modified the impact of an infant and young child feeding (IYCF) intervention, that included SQ-LNS, on stunting at age 18 months in secondary analysis of a randomized trial in rural Zimbabwe. FINDINGS: We found that the impact of the IYCF intervention on stunting was modified by: (i) mother-infant FUT2+/FUT3- phenotype (difference-in-differences -32.6% [95% CI: -55.3%, -9.9%]); (ii) changes in species composition that reflected microbiome maturation (difference-in-differences -68.1% [95% CI: -99.0%, -28.5%); and (iii) greater relative abundance of B. longum (differences-in-differences 49.1% [95% CI: 26.6%, 73.6%]). The dominant strains of B. longum when the intervention started were most similar to the proficient milk oligosaccharide utilizer subspecies infantis, which decreased with infant age and differed by mother-infant FUT2+/FUT3- phenotypes. INTERPRETATION: These findings indicate that a persistently "younger" microbiome at initiation of the intervention reduced its benefits on stunting in areas with a high prevalence of growth restriction. FUNDING: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, UK DFID/Aid, Wellcome Trust, Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation, US National Institutes of Health, UNICEF, and Nutricia Research Foundation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEBioMedicineSame topicChild Nutrition and Water AccessFrench-language works237,207