MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Overview of the International Scientific Conference “Man and the Church in the Christian Thought of Nicholas Berdyaev” (Moscow, March 5–6, 2024)

2024· article· ru· W4402923963 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Я.Р. Пантуева

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Quarterly Journal of St Philaret s Institute · 2024
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligious, Philosophical, and Educational Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyClassicsTheologyEnvironmental ethicsSociologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

5–6 марта 2024 г. в Свято-Филаретовском институте (Москва) прошла международная научная конференция «Человек и церковь в христианской мысли Николая Бердяева», посвященная 150-летию со дня рождения философа. Организатором конференции совместно с СФИ стал Институт мировой литературы (ИМЛИ) имени А. М. Горького РАН (Москва). На конференции присутствовали участники из 7 стран (помимо России, это Бельгия, Болгария, Великобритания, Греция, Канада, Латвия), представлявшие 23 светских и церковных учебных и научных учреждения. Формой проведения конференции стали творческие лаборатории, предполагающие как выступления экспертов, в своих сообщениях отвечающих на предложенные вопросы, так и возможность свободного высказывания каждого из присутствующих. On March 5–6, 2024, the St. Philaret Institute (Moscow) hosted the international scientific conference “Man and Church in the Christian Thought of Nikolai Berdyaev,” dedicated to the 150th anniversary of the philosopher’s birth. The conference was organized jointly with the St. Philaret Institute by the Gorky Institute of World Literature (IMLI) of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Moscow). The conference was attended by participants from 7 countries (in addition to Russia, these were Belgium, Bulgaria, Great Britain, Greece, Canada, and Latvia), representing 23 secular and church educational and scientific institutions. The conference was held in the form of creative laboratories, which included both expert presentations, answering questions in their reports, and the opportunity for each of those present to speak freely.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.439
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Quarterly Journal of St Philaret s InstituteSame topicReligious, Philosophical, and Educational StudiesFrench-language works237,207