MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402924000 · doi:10.1155/2024/2988289

Patient Demographics and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events after Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

2024· article· en· W4402924000 on OpenAlexaff
Christopher J.D. Wallis, Kevin C. Chen, Stuart Atkinson, Deborah M. Boldt‐Houle

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in Urology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaceMedicineAndrogen deprivation therapyProstate cancerDemographicsProportional hazards modelInternal medicineRetrospective cohort studyDemographyOncologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background . The association between patient demographics and CV events after ADT using real‐world data was evaluated. In addition to encompassing >30 times more patients than all previous MACE studies, this is the first study, to the best of our knowledge, to include a comprehensive listing of many demographic factors from one large, recent US dataset over a long period of time. Materials and Methods . The retrospective analysis of data in the Decision Resources Group (now Clarivate) Real World Evidence repository, representing >300M US patients from 1991 to 2020 across all US regions, was performed. Patients with PCa receiving ≥1 ADT injection were included. MACE risk after ADT initiation was evaluated for demographic and potential PCa‐related risk factors. Kaplan–Meier survival curves were constructed, and Cox regression was used to evaluate the association between MACE risk and demographic/PCa‐related risk factors. Results . Overall, MACE risk was slightly lower in the first year after ADT initiation (3.9%) vs. years 2–4 (∼5.2%). In a multivariate Cox model, MACE risk after ADT initiation was significantly higher for older vs. younger patients (adjusted HR per increasing year = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.07–1.09), men with a history of MACE vs. without (HR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.72–2.88), men with very low BMI vs. normal or high BMI (HR for decreasing BMI per kg/m 2 = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01–1.03), White vs. Black patients (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.08–1.55), and patients who did not use statins vs. those who did (HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00–1.27). Of the PCa‐related risk factors, MACE risk after ADT initiation was significantly higher for oncology vs. urology treatment setting (HR = 2.47, 95% CI: 2.12–2.88), patients with baseline metastasis vs. those without (HR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.72–3.07), and patients treated with antagonists vs. agonists (HR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.25–2.10). Conclusions . Demographic factors are important contributors to increased MACE risk for men with PCa on ADT. Clinicians should monitor risk factors and modify if possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.467

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in UrologySame topicCancer, Lipids, and MetabolismFrench-language works237,207