MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402933243 · doi:10.3389/frmbi.2024.1380152

Effects of oral liquiritigenin inoculation on gut microbiota and gene expression in intestinal and extraintestinal tissues of mice

2024· article· en· W4402933243 on OpenAlex
Zhaotaize Suo, Ying Yu, Fangyun Shi, Jijing Tian, Zhihui Hao, Jing‐Ren Zhang, Jun Zou

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Microbiomes · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicPharmacological Effects of Natural Compounds
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Infection and Immunity
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsLiquiritigeninGene expressionInoculationGut floraGeneBiologyMicrobiologyImmunologyMedicineGeneticsPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Liquiritigenin (LQ), a natural flavonoid found in traditional Chinese medicine and often administered orally, holds potential to affect both the gut and its microbiota, that potentially mediating or influencing its biological and pharmacological effects. However, the effects of LQ on gut microbiota composition and intestinal function remain poorly understood. In this study, we aimed to explore the impact of LQ on gut microbiota and gene expression in both intestinal and extraintestinal tissues. Methods: We orally inoculated six-week-old SPF C57BL/6 mice with either LQ (a concentration of 4 mg/ml diluted in dimethylsulfoxide, (DMSO)) or DMSO, and administered daily for a duration of 2 weeks. At the end of the experimental period, all mice were euthanized. Fresh fecal samples, as well as samples from the intestine, lung, and liver, were collected for subsequent microbiota analysis, RNA-seq, or histochemical and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. Results: Findings show that LQ alters gut microbiota composition, enhancing microbial correlations in the colon but causing some dysbiosis, evidenced by increased pathobionts, decreased beneficial bifidobacteria, and reduced microbiota diversity. Gene expression analysis reveals LQ upregulates mucosal immune response genes and antiinfection genes in both the intestine and lung, with histology confirming increased Paneth cells and antimicrobial peptides in the intestine. Additionally, LQ affects tissue-specific gene expression, triggering hypersensitivity genes in the colon, downregulating metabolic genes in the small intestine, and reducing cell motility and adhesion genes in the lung. Discussion: These results suggest LQ's potential to modulate common mucosal immunity but also highlight possible risks of gut dysbiosis and hypersensitivity, particularly in vulnerable individuals. Our study, while informative about the effects of LQ on gut health, lacks direct evidence on whether changes in gut microbiota and gene expression caused by LQ impact inflammatory diseases or are causally linked. Future research should investigate this through fecal microbiota transplantation to explore the causal relationships and LQ's potential effects on immune responses and disease outcomes in relevant models.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.870

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.347 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it