Regenerative stem cell therapy for stroke in Europe (RESSTORE): a multicenter randomized controlled efficacy clinical trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Encouraging the activation of brain repair mechanisms and fostering spontaneous functional recovery in stroke patients hold great promise for alleviating the global burden of this condition and allowing an extended therapeutic time window. Cell-based regenerative therapy (with mesenchymal stem/stromal cells, such as adipose-derived stem cells [ADSCs]) is particularly attractive considering its excellent safety profile, low immunogenicity after allogeneic application, and well-established functional benefits on stroke recovery in animal models. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety effects of intravenous (IV) infusion of freshly cultured allogeneic ADSCs on recovery after ischemic stroke. Population and methods: RESSTORE is a multicentric, randomized 1:1 controlled double-blind clinical trial. Eighty patients will be enrolled in nine French stroke centers. The main inclusion criteria are ≥18 years of age, acute hemispheric ischemic stroke, and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of ≥7, including a motor subscore of ≥3. According to the previous dose-escalation safety trial data, the maximum tolerated dose of 3 million ADSCs/kg was selected. IV infusion was performed within 10 days following stroke onset, with a follow-up over 2 years. Outcomes: The primary endpoint is the motor NIHSS subscore, computed as the sum of the upper limb, lower limb, and hand scores, measured 6 months after stroke onset to assess motor recovery. The secondary outcomes are the occurrence of death/serious adverse events, clinical scores (the detailed NIHSS scores, Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores, modified Rankin Scale scores, Aphasia Handicap Scores, Depression Intensity Scale Circles scores, Fatigue Scale scores, etc.), immune monitoring (for the first 30 patients), and multimodal biomarkers derived from diffusion and functional magnetic resonance imaging. Discussion: This study may provide some evidence for the effects of freshly cultured allogenic ADSCs IV infusion in subacute stroke that may help design a larger international randomized controlled trial. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier: NCT03570450.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".