MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402935595 · doi:10.1101/2024.09.24.614809

Caspase-Activated DNase localizes to cancer causing translocation breakpoints during cell differentiation

2024· preprint· en· W4402935595 on OpenAlexafffund
Dalal Alsowaida, Brian D. Larsen, Sarah Hachmer, M. AZIMI, Eric Arezza, Steve Brunette, Steven Tur, Carmen G. Palii, Bassam Albraidy, Claus Storgaard Sørensen, Marjorie Brand, F. Jeffrey Dilworth, Lynn A. Megeney

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Institutes of HealthCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKing Saud University
KeywordsChromosomal translocationCell biologyCellBreakpointChemistryCaspaseApoptosisBiologyMolecular biologyProgrammed cell deathBiochemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Caspase activated DNase (CAD) induced DNA breaks promote cell differentiation and therapy-induced cancer cell resistance. CAD targeting activity is assumed to be unique to each condition, as differentiation and cancer genesis are divergent cell fates. Here, we made the surprising discovery that a subset of CAD-bound targets in differentiating muscle cells are the same genes involved in the genesis of cancer-causing translocations. In muscle cells, a prominent CAD-bound gene pair is Pax7 and Foxo1a , the mismatched reciprocal loci that give rise to alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. We show that CAD-targeted breaks in the Pax7 gene are physiologic to reduce Pax7 expression, a prerequisite for muscle cell differentiation. A cohort of these CAD gene targets are also conserved in early differentiating T cells and include genes that spur leukemia/lymphoma translocations. Our results suggest the CAD targeting of translocation prone oncogenic genes is non-pathologic biology and aligns with initiation of cell fate transitions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicDNA Repair Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→