MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402936757 · doi:10.1115/1.4066674

Measurement of Steam-Generator-Tube Vibration Damping Caused by Anti-Vibration-Bar Supports

2024· article· en· W4402936757 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Pressure Vessel Technology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEngineering Diagnostics and Reliability
Canadian institutionsCanadian Nuclear LaboratoriesIntertek (Canada)Deep River Science Academy
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVibrationBar (unit)Generator (circuit theory)Boiler (water heating)Tube (container)Structural engineeringMaterials scienceAcousticsEngineeringMechanical engineeringPhysicsPower (physics)ThermodynamicsWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In 2013, Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (now Canadian Nuclear Laboratories) experimentally measured the damping of a straight tube with a variety of tube supports to examine low-frequency damping. These tests were motivated by the discovery of severe tube damage caused by in-plane fluidelastic instability (FEI) in the U-bend regions of new replacement recirculating steam generators (SG). The measurements were intended to assess the applicability of existing design guidelines for estimating the support-related damping of a tube. In the tests, the damping ratios of a single steam generator tube were measured using both log-decrement and power-based methods. Noncontacting excitation and position-sensing techniques were employed to improve accuracy. Initial baseline tests explored configurations with no support and drilled-hole supports of different hole sizes, and these results were compared with previously published work. Subsequent tests were performed to measure damping of tube vibration parallel to flat-bar supports. Most of the tests were performed with the tube fully submerged in still water. The tests examined the effects of fluid (water or air), natural frequency, gap width, preload, and vibration normal to the bars. This paper describes the test apparatus, methods, and analysis techniques. A summary of the results is presented. The initial baseline results showed that the damping ratios measured without any supports and with a drilled-hole support were consistent with previously published data. However, the subsequent measurements showed that, contrary to a published design guideline, the anti-vibration bars resulted in no significant additional viscous or squeeze-film damping when the vibration was parallel to the bars. On the other hand, the results did show that anti-vibration bars could introduce significant in-plane Coulomb-type damping if there was sufficient tube-to-support preload or impacting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it