MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402940273 · doi:10.2196/65455

The Integrating Cultural Aspects Into Diabetes Education (INCLUDE) Study to Prevent Diabetes in Chinese Immigrants: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

2024· article· en· W4402940273 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lu Hu, Nelson Lin, Yun Shi, Jiepin Cao, Mary Ann Sevick, Huilin Li, Jeannette M. Beasley, Natalie Levy, Kosuke Tamura, Xinyi Xu, Yulin Jiang, IRIS H. ONG, Ximin Yang, Yujie Bai, Liwen Su, Sze Wan Chan, Stella S. Yi

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Research Protocols · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institute on Minority Health and Health DisparitiesNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesAgency for Healthcare Research and QualityNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsPreprintProtocol (science)ImmigrationRandomized controlled trialDiabetes mellitusMedicineGerontologyPsychologyAlternative medicineComputer scienceWorld Wide WebPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) contributes to significant morbidity and mortality for Chinese immigrants in the United States, exacerbated by social determinants of health (SDOH) barriers such as language barriers, limited access to healthy foods, and low health literacy. OBJECTIVE: The goal of the Integrating Cultural Aspects into Diabetes Education (INCLUDE) study is to test a social media-based intervention adapting the Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) for Chinese immigrants alongside a culturally adapted, community-supported agriculture program. Here, we report the protocol for the INCLUDE study. METHODS: INCLUDE is a 3-year randomized controlled trial (n=150). Participants with prediabetes or at risk for T2D are enrolled and randomized into either the control or intervention group (n=75 each). Participants from the intervention group receive 2-3 culturally tailored, in-language DPP videos weekly for 12 weeks, as well as biweekly phone calls from bilingual study staff to review video content, support goal setting, and assess and address SDOH-related barriers such as food insecurity. Intervention participants will also be given produce for 10 weeks as part of the community-supported agriculture program. Weight (primary outcome), self-efficacy, diet, physical activity, and food insecurity (secondary outcomes) are measured at baseline, 3-month, and 6-month intervals. Splined linear mixed models will be used to examine group differences in longitudinal weight and other secondary outcomes. The INCLUDE study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine. RESULTS: Recruitment started in May 2023, with the first cohort of 75 participants enrolled and randomized into 2 groups in July 2023. The 3-month and 6-month assessment of the first-year cohort has been completed. We have recruited 75 participants for the second cohort as of July 2024. CONCLUSIONS: The INCLUDE study will serve as an innovative model for culturally adapted, multilevel interventions for underserved communities previously unable to access evidence-based diabetes prevention initiatives. Aligning with several national calls for multilevel interventions, the INCLUDE intervention will provide critical data that will inform how researchers and public health professionals address SDOH barriers faced by underserved populations and prevent diabetes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05492916; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05492916. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/65455.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.036
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.028
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.085
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0360.028
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0080.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0140.006
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.004
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0070.010
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0850.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.539
Teacher spread0.472 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Research Protocols→Same topicDiabetes Management and Education→French-language works237,207→